1/6/2023 0 Comments Macinema bestiality
Since the samples are pretty unevenly distributed (lots of white people and not a lot of others, for example), I’m slightly more suspicious of the results I interpret this to indicate a greater chance of sampling bias somewhere. I didn’t include other ethnicities due to lower sample size. For example, if an animal has a score of 0.4, this means that 40% of everyone who selected being sexually interested in that animal, also selected that animal as their *most* favorite. This graph below is the ratio of which animals got the ‘most’ rating, to the animals that got ‘any’ interest. I did end up fixing this, but this means the resulting sample size for the less popular animals is lower - only 1022 males and 482 females.Īfter people checked all the animals they were into, I then presented them a second question with those animals and asked them to select which animal they liked the most. If they marked interest in “more animals not listed” there, then I gave them another list of the less popular animals.Ī small error resulted in people not getting the second list for part of my survey run. In my survey, I asked people about half of these animals (the ones I estimated would be more popular). (Around 6.5% of males responding to my survey reported preferring penises over vaginas at least a little bit, and 13% of females reported preferring vaginas over penises at least a little bit)įiltering for people into bestiality, I looked at the % of men and women who found various animals erotic, and then took the ratio between these scores to find the animals most disproportionately gender-preferred. Next smallest bins were females with exclusive vagina preference (273), males with slight penis preference (277), males with exclusive penis preference (482), and males with majority penis preference (631). And some of the bins here did get pretty low - the smallest being females reporting slight preference for people with vaginas, which was 214. I changed this question partway through the survey, so am limiting sample to after-change, which is only ~30k. I’m not sure what to make of this (especially the dropoff for exclusive penis preference?), but this seems like a pretty massive difference. Of males who report exclusively preference for people with vaginas, closer to 8% do. To clarify this chart: for example, of males who report a majority people-with-penis preference, nearly 30% of them report interest in bestiality. We’re kickin the first one off with a woof - bestiality! #Macinema bestiality series#My current plan is to post a series of blog posts, each one focused on one fetish category. If you use it to accuse them of being bad, you are missing the entire point of all of this research, which is to explore the cause and effect of sexuality with open-minded, compassionate curiosity. Any individual demographic of people who are more into a specific kink you might find offensive is not an indication they are bad. It is possible to practice high risk kink ethically, or to not practice at all. Being into a kink that is associated with bad things does not make you bad. Being into a rare kink doesn’t make you bad. People almost never get to choose what turns them on. #Macinema bestiality update#If you find any errors, tell me and I’ll update this post!)Īlso my general stance on kink, which I will be including at the beginning of all these posts: #Macinema bestiality full#I’m planning on sharing the full raw data eventually, but I want to spend a lot more effort on ensuring it’s anonymous before doing so. #Macinema bestiality code#You can check the code I’m using (at the time of writing this) and the full question texts for the entirety of the survey here, and a sample of the (already mostly cleaned) data (with email columns removed). Some disclaimers: I learned-as-I-went for most of what I did in this blog post, including some statistics, learning the language (guided track) for making the survey, and learning python for processing the data, which is my first introduction to any programming! I’m spot checking along the way, and occasionally get extra eyes to skim over what I’m doing, but there’s always a chance of error. (survey design methodology here, breakdown of where I found these people and their demographics here ) I asked ~34,000 people if they were interested in bestiality!
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |